Rocket Man?[!]

 

...OFF ?

 

The irony or Mittstory is in the geometrics, and might be the in-f-able [!] 

The launch pad is another matter but it takes 3 points to make a plane, and this is a blank 'f 'n odd footnote.  But stinking to the story or retro-jets, this is the 4th post-note or footnote*. 

 

 * anachronism may be moved/adjusted later

[The point for now is that I am behind on the follow-up in the area of the first three posts for this month.  And then after the last bulky post and plan to asterisk or footnote, found that those original 3 had many of the images I had just 4-matted un-a-knew[!] Now that is the ticket.  Almost.

a. I Ron Knee Chef

b. In the Beginning

c. REFRAIN is a Heckuva Paradocs[!]

d. A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the News Stand ouch

e. Calm Pend E Um

f. Total eclipse of the

g. 4A? FOOTNOTES: SEPTEMBER 2012

h. Catch-22?

i. In the Mean Time...

j. (anomoly^ of al gore rhythm and heading?)

k.

l.

m.

n.

Oh and the reality is that things change, not that they are right in the first or next place, but for now I think I have logged the links correctly if not as planned.

2-point-oh... and "lables"la not LGF for now. 

 

^ (b.s.)= blog search 4 (sic)+pun and at this time includes "a." thru "n." which will off** course change with time if not also algorithms of BlogSpot beyond my understanding.  But one anomoly of that sort appears just as I switched 4mat between "i." and "j.", not that I did not trigger something I just don't know why I chose to save some time and effort if not meaning and the "headings" switched from being self-linked to prior linked, upon scrolling over them.  In the Mean Time...  ...  SIX SIGMA .  And I better stop now before who knows what. 

 

** not to make dark of the light (but that was a typo... I ...THINK.)

 

Q ED ?

Stardate: 10.18.12.9.53pdt

 

[Update: under construction or*** 4Mat review.]

*** i.e. footnotes re:GPS'n. Countdown to Current?(dot/dot/dot)

Actually I am burying a link. Best Wishes4Fishes.  And Beyond(TimAllen)Bu'hhhh-Dump-ump[!]

 

 

Preemptive Footnote

Not to B, preposterous.  [Editor's note: review links later.]

Preface to FOOTNOTES OCTOBER 2012

Jolly Roger?  October Motif?
R,R,R! Or Simon Says?  (Right off the bat...)(*fn) 

September(**fn) Archive.
closing 10-1-12 Forward to FOOTNOTES: continue here: FOOTNOTES OCTOBER 2012  ]


NOT TO MITT-FLOP: but I will process the footnotes scrolling down in time as opposed to September's format.

[[]]
10-1-12
IN FACT SCRATCH THIS AS PREFACE OF SORTS.
[EDITOR"S NOTE: SEE FOOTNOTES OCTOBER 2012 Continued there. ]
10-1-12
[[]]

[]
[10-1-12 preemptive post to month of October.]
(*fn) =footnote on (FOOTNOTES OCTOBER...)
[bat= pun on Halloween and my going right off track with the footnotes protocol]
Not to trickle-down. (Scroll over for Ribble?)
B'log Search(b.s.): jolly + roger ( a, b )
October: Walking the Plank[!]
Motif: (b.s.) PEG'd ( a , b )
(**fn) Still some in draft for September.
(Ribble= ribbing/riddle  Hint: a bit of a pin the foot on the pirate.)
[] braketed close of asterisks to Forward.


FLASHNOTE: 10-5-12  http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/presidential-debate-top-7-romney-comments-youd-swear-he-could-never-have-said-but-did/news/2012/10/03/50276NOT!  OCTOBER NO SUPRISE!
Nor: http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2012/10/04/958801/at-last-nights-debate-romney-told-27-myths-in-38-minutes/

First Debate: Zinger Score 2 to -1:  (comcast log)"take" etc.
Tough reviews for Jim Lehrer as debate moderator.
Romney barrels out of first debate on offense.
FACT CHECK: Presidential debate missteps.
Obama: Jobs report shows economy is on right track.>?
What the?  Ouch* < ! 

Replacement Refs or Not... 
I can't keep up with the debate ball of wax, or FOX-coop and egg heading. 
Post Ouch^*:
"spiracy":The Vice President Rolls
"math+godliness": My Respects to Those who Celebrate.
Might be maybe?

10-7-12 <*> "debate" http://xfinity.comcast.net/video/McCain-Romney-wins-first-debate-but-/2287378762/FoxNews/newest/ <*> 

FOOTNOTES OCTOBER 2012

See Preface or Forward.
NOT TO MITT-FLOP: but I will process the footnotes scrolling down in time as opposed to September's format.


10-1-12 Preemptive Footnote:  PEG'd flag?  Pre-Post-or-us?

10-1-12 Simon says 2 point or...?  <= Crtl F "work in progress"
twitchy:
Politico: Mitt Romney: King of comedy
A.
g.  World Order is the Hardest Work. (GO TO Ctrl F above and there)
Z.

10-2-12 Simon says 2 point or...?   [update: "Thanks to my Bane or Tan Gents...]
(links bubbl'in up)
the tale: Off the Cuff
Keys:  (b.s. font, Charts )
the C: (b.s. nail, see "the tale")
Hoods: The %th EleFont
pinning: (b.s. bill yards) Rhetorical Been Laden[*] In-Chief
chicken-hawks: (b.s. egg head) Contempt for Courage
[after math: Andrea Mitchell?]

Dancing &Co

Dancing and Bernstein*** and Simon Says.
Is Roger Simon concidering a genre change?
Or has he always been so sharp? 
Unlike?(Wall Street Joe?)[Or is it Mourning Joe?]


9-28-12  Follow-up :  Sharp Unlike.
Roger Simon's parody of a mockery on the campaign trail **.  (Or cam pain?*)
Wall Street Journal agrees it is the stupid congress. 

*Tommy Christopher digs deeper. 'zzzzzzzz'
(Iron knee of sat ire read it completely.) 

**  (b.s. ). satire mockery
*** can Ohioans do math or what [!] ?
(I know percentage does not equal vote but I am employing mythmatic.  Chances of Romney win in Ohio below 4%. Yet to compare maps or 538.)   

[Bottomline:  It is not the prophets or Simon says corporate capitalizers, but it may be the Peter Paul and Mary principle.  No, just the Peter principle and robbing Paul to pay Peter.  A bird in the hand is worth not having two bushes or an etch-a-sketch Bush is more dangerous when they think they will do one^ better.] 

^ not to (fn) butt... 

Total eclipse of the

gut?
FuN[?]

9-26-12
President Obama mentioned a time warp.
Clinton mentioned arithmatic.
Not to leave it on a try angle, but...
UN Speech,*** 
filed to read*.

The Cycle** was particularly good yesterday.

* more with the apology mitt-flop
** not exactly

 [***There is no violence that justifies mindless speech. The only thing to fear is understanding itself. To Romney they are not bumps in the road, but that is what they are when you aren't kicking a can down the road.]

[ SatIre of a Mockery: Simone Says (?)]

*** 9-27-12  Just to be clear, there are no quotation marks in the 1st  bracketed['s]  while the satire in the 2nd broke later.  I am putting a spin on President Obama's point about free speech verses[!]
"terror".  While Roger Simone puts a spin on "free speech" and the Romney/Ryan campaign.  Not to mention Dansing Bernstein. 

[!]= (sic) or pun on versus or verse us cycle.(OK... it evolved.)

FN(Footnotes) not (fn): from the top
FB: Turn Around Bright Eyes
(YouTube): unembedded from FB
(Bloomberg unembedded)
try: The Fed’s Best Rationale for QE3
angle: Be Smart, Not Just Tough, in the Middle East
but: did Obama stand up?(under construction)

REFRAIN is a Heckuva Paradocs[!]

(sic)or sarChasm of paradox: 
A return to economic sanity ? *

Appropriately there are only two links so far,
anachronistic^^ may they be: 
Andrew Leonard on the hope and change sanity at the Fed.
Sam Stein on raising the payroll cap on Social Secutity to fill the gap.

The Aster Risk[*] revolves on the Fight of the Century and Jon Stewart's take on "printing money" Bernanke**. (C-Mitt-\-warps)

Watch(out) for Lede Crack:*** 
"I don't want to be subjective, but it is my Austrian perspective."

* links Chasm and return Mitt time warps
** (a)YouTube, (b)60 Minutes, (c)NPR 
***(Step on a Rap)
[Lede Crack nails the paradox(fills the gap) of objective/subjectivism.]
Tacky Tact Tack: Romney Wrong Track^
Economy or Economics: NOT

^ Leder Tapes.
Mark Leder Tapes: Marc's pun on leader(and the twain)
[Belated Rebuttal or Re-Frame ? ]
(fn)
[^^ NOT TO MITT-FLOP: SNL(Salon Notes List) Marry X-mass [!] = (sic)]

[*] This footnote segues between Ding and A.(from earlier draft) leaving out the middle and emblematic of Mitt and his flip-flop of economics. (** a & b)  It is Keynesian not Supply or Demand. The Fight of the Century is a mockery of a satire on economics and the Deflation of Bernanke by Jon Stewart(**c) is a satire of a mockery of economics.
(fn)
[Um...Ouch ! ]

Tacky, tact, tack...

Who let the Dogfish* out?
Apology Cruise?

* not exactly [!]

Apology Cruise?  First, a Dogfish is a shark and I must admit to participating in their demise as a fisherman.  A billy-club or gaff hook is the tool of choice.  Second, Akin to fishing trips or the Romney Embassy gaff is Juan Coles hook to "Jumping the Shark".  Irony of Wrong Knees**, "legitimate rape" is almost long forgotten, what with the "empty chair" and the "Leder" Twain. 

** I am not implying Right or Wrong, only Diploma See.^

^ of Right and Wrong
S.E. Cupp
Evan Kohlmann

[9-20-12: or non-Prof-etiq et tu?  AM Clint 'n's Worlds?]

Off the Cuff

Or the bottom line ?
Only the twain?

See Label
(I pun on the Mark Leder Tapes)
I know it is inarticulate, but I like his style.  He does his own warm up act, but less than 3 minutes in he frames the future as "China working with us" or "something like Europe"...

See [Fog of Math!?]
Re: Off Track

The Trouble with the Mitt:
His 47% rant is political.  
His MC hammer is off. 
Not to pun on the MC but his nail is the 96%!

There is the trouble with his charts,


trouble with his "entitles"



and trouble both domestic















 and foreign.

I may be forgetting something but I shall probably return.

Re:Focus

TIME is not on anyone's side.

(NFRY)
related links : Joe Klein
Paralysis Rules
One for All and All for One
Is Romney a Realist or an Idealist?
Paul Ryan's Grand Vision
The Trouble with Simpson-Bowles

(fn) not yet

[Re-visit ! ?]

[Re:Boot ?]

[Let her role ?^^ ]
AM ?
NOW ?
Mitt-matic ?
Cheese US ?
Or Bane^ ? !
Or Diploma See!

^ The Best Defense(Mine'd Hive?)
^^ But a blimp[!] The Mark Leder Twain.

[Fog of Math!?]
[Brass Balls? Or Dorothy's Slippers?]

Trouble with the Curve?

 

W'rithmatic and the Empty Chair.
It's Marvelous! *


Obama is 4... the 96%!

*not an endorsement


Waaaaa!!!!!  ;-): 

The Top 5%** income brackets pay 38% of total taxes collected on 35% of the nations income, while the bottom 95% pay ONLY 62% of taxes on 64% of the nations total income[!***]




** thanks to Jared Bernstein's colleagues and Citizens for Tax Justice.
*** real math is not that inciteful !

...promote the general...

Welfare(the 29th word in the Constitution).



Pre-Obama^, starker contrast.

And this is^^^ pre-Romney's Rough Road on MSNBC.
Jobs First? But not foremost.  Running from politics. 
His best defense is his cuff and hope he is phoney and fisher of men.
(I won't go there.) But the map is looking familiar. 
Fixing News(pun on breaking news): Carney(Obama "we are in this together").

Ari Melber is almost there where I haven't gotten yet. That is, what is actually taken from the paychecks of the middle class.  Payroll tax. NOW Alex Wagner is almost there.  Not only do the top 4%* get the same tax deductions and breaks as the bottom brackets(a. how many %) they get a break from the payroll tax from a second and third point. (b. over $97,500  c. capital gains ) 






[Now please take no offense at the significance of any Cretans.]

* 96% should be the Obama "entitle" R's [!]**

NOTE: Charts are being filled out here. See PAGES (right column)
NOTE: Charts of Sorts.( Tetra Heed Rons, and Wedges & Corny Copy Yeah)

** rough math but look at the right side of the second chart and see on the left that $250,000 -- and now John Sununu is doing the W'rithatic on Andrea Mitchell, but it goes to the arithmatic that is wrong -- it should be clear that the middle class is well below what Romney thinks it is and the President is for the bottom 96% well more than the 47% Romney thinks supports Obama.

^ missing link as to how I stumbled on this one (but there is a mixing of metaphors for horses and Teddy(Obama^^) Bulls. 
^^

^^^ inserted post charts et al
[Last Word ? Yeah right ! Or Left ! Re: Cycle ? R ! Not !]
[Brilliance of Democracy.]

[Strategic Pause: News Nation: No, Time is not a-side ! ]

[What the heck is the point?  It is the process and the purpose.]

One Heckuva Day.

I take this opportunity to note belatedly the 225th birthday of the Constitution, and the 1st Anniversary of Occupy Wallstreet, but Mitt still takes the day hands down. 

9-18-12
http://billmoyers.com/2012/09/14/what-the-founding-fathers-wanted/
The Dickens you say ?[!]

Obama the Uniter!

It is about the politics.  I am not finished searching for a reference* I recently heard George W. Bush make, but it was in retrospect about his handling of politics and how he did not worry about it**.  Apparently it was someone elses job.  But what is the politics(?) is my point.^  Bush claimed himself the uniter. Obama is the uniter of politics.  As in there is the partisan divide, and there is nothing wrong with making that clear, but there is the political process which Romney is also not all about, let alone making it clear.   

*what me worry?  Applies to GWB, Reagan, Mitt and facts
** Rove was believe somehow involved, and probably Cheney
*** I might be getting warmR but I have not embedded this asterisk yet.

^ more what Mittastrophe?

Politics is local?

Ground Game ? *

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/an-embassy-statement-a-tweet-and-a-major-misunderstanding/2012/09/12/a2d32a8c-fd24-11e1-b153-218509a954e1_blog.html

http://open.salon.com/blog/ted_frier/2012/09/12/losing_gop_in_denial_over_own_failures
http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/why_i_left_the_gop/

http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/mitt%E2%80%99s_shameful_libya_statement/
http://theweek.com/article/index/233148/the-death-of-an-american-in-libya

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/an-embassy-statement-a-tweet-and-a-major-misunderstanding/2012/09/12/a2d32a8c-fd24-11e1-b153-218509a954e1_blog.html

http://www.salon.com/2012/09/13/cairo_embassys_statement_what_went_wrong/

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032608/ns/meet_the_press-meet_the_press/vp/48959856/#48959768 ***

Not the usual MO.** 

[ http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/2012/09/13/house-race-koster-opts-for-the-full-romney/ ]

*Scroll over is sufficient until [fn] and post /under-construction(also redux labels) R done.
** "well" not exactly [!]

*** dropped link [!]

[Unfinished read, refinished read.(perspectivism) Politics over war.  Obama has made progress in foreign policy, but Republicans want to take it back.  The wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Egypt, and Iran(an evolution) are the examples of diplomacy(d) over preemption.  It all sprung from the 2000 election debacle, resistance to Clinton policy and the failure on September 11th with the supposed post-9-11 world.  But it is spelled out in the perspective that we cannot expect to teach democracy or politics over there, without practicing it over here(^).  I will refrain from further tangents or links on this post, but I will note that the two reads just mentioned also reflect a bit of a balancing act that is not nearly as cut and dry as it might be written.  One of the key differences in the big picture that makes the previous administration a stand out failure in American History is the combination of the voodoo(b) economics(arithmatic/fuzzy math+fuzzy English) with the neo-con perspective of American Exceptionalism (which is not) exemplified by choosing a war without paying for it.  The success that is so difficult is because politics is local except for them^(f).  This is demonstrated by the current Radical Republican opposition(c) to the Arab Spring,^^^ which removed dictators and is allowing(a) for democracy that might not turn out to be to our liking.  Bush said war is hard work, but just because you want to fight, does not mean that progress and peace(with diplomacy and politics) are not harder work, and more profitable.  That is part of true exceptionalism.

^refrain from a bumber snicker]

9-15-12
(a) FOX wrong about Libya says McCain.
(b) Foreign policy is Bane of Politics: bankruptcy bailout business not an option in either.
(c)  Loose lips? Republican Threat to National Security
(d) not! but whiney!

(^) ibid re^frain [see (d)]

9-17-12 (e) not embedded  i.e. that's right, there is no (e)
Seriously [!] folks ?
[^^ Apologies for sarcasm, but there is a diversity of reliability in the perspectives/sources provided.]
[NOW^^^ w/Alex Wagner w/Martin Basher on America Abroad.^^ But natural track of changing the strategy for Romney of change or status quo. i.e. hijacking change and boogieman status quo. Cam-Pain not working, Obama not running.]
[There is an (f) ]
^^ viscous cycle of anachronism
^^^ then Martin Bashir (NeoMitt)(Mittastrophe of asterisked?)

Rhetorical Been Laden[*] In-Chief

Raw Money ? [!]*
Or #2 man ?

[Actually I take a punt a bit far, but the Monday mourning quarterback is a field goal** behind.  I had earlier reacted to Romney not even being a water boy with his arithmatic***.]
[Or Rowdy Yeats ?]
[Been gone ? ]

* exception to the punctuation ?
** belated insert
*** also belated premption
[The domestic threat the GOP is over here is taken over there.]

[*] 9-14-12 asterisk added for English emphasis not bill yards.

[fn / under construction]

Refrain Post Frain?

It seems to come almost naturally to some***.  You might ask, what?  I won't go there, nor refrain.
Tan Gent not implied*, but it is a bit like a satire of a mockery. 
So here are some unread links to file for later.
Dangerous Narratives
Whose Maker
Obama Role
The Bounce?

* anachronism intended

Footnotes** Change

** click Footnotes for details

*** exception to the rule(bottom line) [Footnotes** Change] appropriately
i.e. yet to footnote but what the google[anachronism unintended] or is it?
[Not so RawMoney.]
[Ed Word]

[fn] Re:**

Fall-Awful on Mitt's Face!

The eleventh anniversary of September 11th had not yet passed when it was announced[^] that American embassies were under attack. 

Over this lede is the heading*[^^] that we need to turn around.***  It is bad enough that business is not the experience we need in the executive branch, but it certainly is not the same as diplomacy.** 

And foreign policy is really up there when it comes to trickle-down on the bottom line. But it really is more of a climate study with seeds of clouds so to speak and not passing the buck.[^^^] 

*Heading is the top line: Fall-Awful on Mitt's Face!
** Bush League Revisited?
*** apologies for Iron Knee or embedded nuance?

[^]9-13-12 due to update the link is not the earliest
[^^] my original source
[latest]

[Retro footnotes: scroll over for uncrossrhodes GPS.]

[fn]

Forward?

Looking Back at September 11th, 2001


 
 

[9-12-12:  Politics is always at the forefront.]

[fn]

Other Mysterious Ways...

There is W*rithmatic and After Math.

History:
George H.W. Bush**
Ronald Wilson Reagan ***
Bill Clinton: "arithmatic"*
George W. Bush

* "you do the vous do"(including links) was posted pre-Clinton's speech.
** H.W. was against it before he was after him(Reaganomics)
*** flip-flop

[fn]